Funded Financial Services Startups in Mountain View
Across the 15 listed Mountain View financial services startups, the largest disclosed round is Abra’s $55M on 2021-09-15, which is the only disclosed amoun…
Across the 15 listed Mountain View financial services startups, the largest disclosed round is Abra’s $55M on 2021-09-15, which is the only disclosed amount above $50M and sits well above the next-largest disclosed figures (Credit Sesame at $51M on 2021-06-08; Vareto at $20M on 2021-10-01). Disclosed amounts below that top tier cluster around multiple sub-$10M rounds, including Neo.Tax’s $10M on 2022-02-10 and Prodigal’s $12M on 2021-07-22.
The rounds span 2020-03-16 (Trimwire) through 2024-11-19 (JustPaid), with a noticeable concentration in 2021–2022: five entries are dated 2021 (Abra, Vareto, Prodigal, Credit Sesame, plus Credit Sesame’s same-year $51M) and four are dated 2022 (Syndicate, TabaPay, Neo.Tax, and Bankjoy). Geography is tightly consistent (all rows list Mountain View, California), while funding documentation is frequently missing: 5 of 15 rows are “undisclosed” and 5 of 15 are “Series Unknown” (including multiple otherwise similar “undisclosed” entries).
Most recent rounds
15 shownRelated listings
Frequently asked
What stands out in disclosed deal sizes for Mountain View financial services, and is there a true top-tier outlier?
Abra’s $55M disclosed round on 2021-09-15 is the only disclosed amount above $50M, followed closely by Credit Sesame’s $51M on 2021-06-08; the next-largest disclosed is Vareto’s $20M on 2021-10-01, making the top two significantly larger than the rest of the disclosed set.
Do these Mountain View financial services rounds cluster in a specific time window?
Yes. The dataset shows a heavy 2021–2022 presence: five entries are dated in 2021 (including Abra $55M on 2021-09-15 and Credit Sesame $51M on 2021-06-08) and four entries are dated in 2022 (Syndicate $6M on 2022-05-03, TabaPay $100K on 2022-03-01, and Neo.Tax $10M on 2022-02-10).
How often are amounts or stages missing, and does that pattern affect comparability of rounds?
Missing documentation is common: 5 of 15 rows list amounts as “undisclosed” (e.g., JustPaid on 2024-11-19; Arta Finance on 2024-09-11) and 5 of 15 rows list “Series Unknown” stages (e.g., Arta Finance on 2024-09-11; MOVEX on 2023-05-04). This means only a subset can be cleanly compared by both timing and disclosed size.
Which stage labels appear most often among the provided entries?
Stage information is split across named rounds and unknowns, but the most repeated named label is “Series A,” appearing on Vareto ($20M, 2021-10-01), Neo.Tax ($10M, 2022-02-10), and Prodigal ($12M, 2021-07-22). Other named stages include Abra’s “Series C” ($55M, 2021-09-15) and TabaPay’s “Venture - Series Unknown” ($100K, 2022-03-01).
Are there low-end disclosed rounds that act as size outliers versus the rest of the disclosed amounts?
TabaPay’s $100K disclosed round on 2022-03-01 is the smallest disclosed amount in the list, far below other disclosed figures like Inri’s $500K on 2023-04-05 and Hummingbot’s $2M on 2023-04-03. That low floor is an outlier relative to the bulk of disclosed rounds in the hundreds of thousands to tens of millions.
Know which startups just got funded. Every week.
Fresh funding rounds, new companies, and the sectors moving fastest — in your inbox every Monday morning.
Free. Sent every Monday. Unsubscribe anytime.