Funded Financial Services Startups in Austria
Across the 14 most recent funding entries shown, Bitpanda’s $263M round (2021-08-17) is a clear outlier; every other disclosed amount here is $10M or below…
Across the 14 most recent funding entries shown, Bitpanda’s $263M round (2021-08-17) is a clear outlier; every other disclosed amount here is $10M or below, including Helu.io’s $10M (2022-07-27) and the next-highest disclosed rounds CMTA’s $5M (2023-06-12) and Coinpanion/Brickwise’s $4M (2022-04-12 and 2021-12-02). The disclosed amounts therefore cluster heavily in the single-digit millions, while the top disclosed figure dwarfs the rest.
The list also clusters temporally: five rounds fall between 2023-01-13 and 2024-07-02 (linx4, simplify.art, CMTA, Trever, and Froots), with Vienna-based companies appearing most often (Froots, simplify.art, linx4 - Pay-per-Use Financing, Helu.io, Coinpanion, Brickwise, Bitpanda, Rendity, Morpher, and kompany). Stage information is frequently missing or not standardized: there are 4 rows marked “undisclosed” and 6 rows with a blank/unspecified stage, limiting cross-round comparisons beyond the visible Seed/Series A/Series C labels. Round dates span 2020-08-05 (kompany) to 2025-06-05 (Froots).
Most recent rounds
14 shownRelated listings
Frequently asked
What’s the largest disclosed round in Austrian financial services here, and how does it compare to the rest of the disclosed amounts?
Bitpanda’s $263M on 2021-08-17 is the largest disclosed amount, and it dwarfs the next-highest disclosed figure of $10M (Helu.io on 2022-07-27). All other disclosed amounts shown sit at $5M or below (e.g., CMTA $5M on 2023-06-12; Coinpanion/Brickwise $4M on 2022-04-12 and 2021-12-02).
Are the rounds concentrated in a particular recent time window, or are they evenly spread?
They’re concentrated toward the middle-late part of the window: five entries have round dates between 2023-01-13 (linx4 - Pay-per-Use Financing) and 2024-07-02 (Trever), including simplify.art ($740K on 2023-03-04) and CMTA ($5M on 2023-06-12). The overall date range for the 14 rows runs from 2020-08-05 (kompany) to 2025-06-05 (Froots).
Which locations are over-represented across these entries?
Vienna is the dominant city in this slice, appearing for Froots (2025-06-05), simplify.art (2023-03-04), linx4 (2023-01-13), Helu.io (2022-07-27), Coinpanion (2022-04-12), Brickwise (2021-12-02), Bitpanda (2021-08-17), Rendity (2020-11-10), Morpher (2020-08-11), and kompany (2020-08-05). By contrast, non-Vienna cities are fewer and more dispersed (e.g., Linz for Blockpit GmbH and NodeVenture, and Graz for Trever and CMTA).
How much of the stage data is missing, and does that limit how much can be inferred from stage labels?
Stage granularity is limited: 4 rows explicitly show “undisclosed” amounts (Blockpit GmbH 2025-03-18; linx4 - Pay-per-Use Financing 2023-01-13; NodeVenture 2022-10-17; Blockpit GmbH is one of the four) and 6 rows have a blank/unspecified stage (Rendity 2020-11-10, Morpher 2020-08-11, kompany 2020-08-05, plus other blanks in the rows shown). Visible labels still include Seed (e.g., Froots 2025-06-05; Trever 2024-07-02) and Series A (Helu.io 2022-07-27; linx4 2023-01-13 is labeled Series A despite the undisclosed amount).
Are there any notable outliers besides the overall size leader?
Yes: the magnitude gap is extreme after the top of the list—Bitpanda’s $263M (2021-08-17) contrasts with all other disclosed rounds at $10M or below, including Helu.io’s $10M (2022-07-27) and several entries clustered at $3M (Froots 2025-06-05 and Trever 2024-07-02). A separate outlier in the data structure is that multiple rows lack disclosed amounts (e.g., Blockpit GmbH on 2025-03-18 and NodeVenture on 2022-10-17), which makes comparisons across those entries inherently incomplete.
Know which startups just got funded. Every week.
Fresh funding rounds, new companies, and the sectors moving fastest — in your inbox every Monday morning.
Free. Sent every Monday. Unsubscribe anytime.