Funded Data and Analytics Startups in Los Angeles
Disclosed funding in Los Angeles data-and-analytics rounds is led by Entertainment Data Oracle (EDO), which raised $80M on 2022-04-06; the next-largest dis…
Disclosed funding in Los Angeles data-and-analytics rounds is led by Entertainment Data Oracle (EDO), which raised $80M on 2022-04-06; the next-largest disclosed amounts are $25M (Trust on 2022-04-19) and $17M (Bobsled, Inc. on 2023-04-25), making EDO’s round a clear outlier above the rest. Stage is skewed toward early funding labels: 7 of the 13 rows are Seed/Grant/Convertible Note, and 2 of 13 are Series A, with the remaining entries split across Series Unknown, Debt Financing, and Private Equity.
The most recent entries cluster in the later half of the table: 4 of 13 rounds closed between 2024-08-26 (PrivacyHawk) and 2025-07-15 (Rwazi). Dates span from 2021-07-12 (Sugar) to 2025-07-15, and all 13 rows list Los Angeles, California with no other city variants. Classification gaps also appear in the dataset: 2 of 13 rounds are “Series Unknown” (Paragon on 2024-10-29 and Nexleaf Analytics on 2023-12-20), and 1 of 13 is “undisclosed” (ARwall on 2021-10-08).
Most recent rounds
13 shownRelated listings
Frequently asked
Which disclosed round is the clear outlier, and how far above the next-largest disclosed amount is it?
Entertainment Data Oracle (EDO) shows the largest disclosed amount at $80M (2022-04-06). The next-largest disclosed rounds are $25M (Trust, 2022-04-19) and $17M (Bobsled, Inc., 2023-04-25), so EDO’s $80M dwarfs the rest of the disclosed figures on the page.
Is there a tight time window where multiple rounds close, or is funding spread evenly across years?
Funding is not evenly spread: 4 of 13 rounds occur between 2024-08-26 (PrivacyHawk, $3M) and 2025-07-15 (Rwazi, $12M). Outside that window, there are earlier clusters in 2022 (EDO $80M on 2022-04-06; Trust $25M on 2022-04-19) and 2023 (Nexleaf Analytics $600K on 2023-12-20 and Bobsled, Inc. $17M on 2023-04-25).
What stage mix dominates among the 13 rows, considering undisclosed and “Series Unknown”?
If “Series Unknown” and “undisclosed” are treated as non-standard labels, the early-stage bucket still leads: Seed/Grant/Convertible Note account for 7 of 13 rows (e.g., PrivacyHawk Seed $3M on 2024-08-26; SDF Seed $9M on 2024-06-26; FanSifter Grant $200K on 2021-09-01; Preveta Convertible Note $100K on 2022-01-22). Only 2 of 13 are explicitly labeled Series A (Rwazi $12M on 2025-07-15; Bobsled, Inc. $17M on 2023-04-25).
Are any stages or classifications missing enough that they affect comparisons across the list?
Yes: 2 of 13 rounds are “Series Unknown” (Paragon $6M on 2024-10-29; Nexleaf Analytics $600K on 2023-12-20), and 1 of 13 is “undisclosed” (ARwall on 2021-10-08). That leaves fewer rows with directly comparable stage labels when ranking by typical funding stage.
Which entries should be reviewed first if the goal is funding size coverage from small to large?
At the small end, Preveta lists $100K on 2022-01-22 and ROADMEDIC® lists $400K on 2022-11-01 (with Nexleaf Analytics at $600K on 2023-12-20). At the top end, EDO’s $80M (2022-04-06) sits far above the next-largest disclosed amounts ($25M Trust on 2022-04-19 and $17M Bobsled, Inc. on 2023-04-25).
Know which startups just got funded. Every week.
Fresh funding rounds, new companies, and the sectors moving fastest — in your inbox every Monday morning.
Free. Sent every Monday. Unsubscribe anytime.