Funded Administrative Services Startups in Denmark
Across the 14 most recent Denmark administrative-services entries, the largest disclosed round is Templafy’s $60M on 2021-06-16; it dwarfs the next-largest…
Across the 14 most recent Denmark administrative-services entries, the largest disclosed round is Templafy’s $60M on 2021-06-16; it dwarfs the next-largest disclosed amounts in this slice (e.g., Forecast at $19M on 2021-05-19 and eloomi at $55M on 2021-06-07 are close in scale, but most others sit at $6M or below). The segment also concentrates geographically: 12 of 14 entries are based in Copenhagen (e.g., The Hub on 2026-06-26 and QuadSAT’s $6M round in Odense is a clear break from that pattern). Temporally, the visible distribution is split: several rounds cluster around May–June 2021 (Forecast $19M on 2021-05-19; Worksome $13M on 2021-05-13; Tame $6M on 2021-05-04; eloomi $55M on 2021-06-07; Templafy $60M on 2021-06-16), while the newest row lands on 2026-06-26 (The Hub at $1M). Stage mix is also skewed toward unfilled labels: 7 of 14 rows are marked “Series Unknown” or blank, and Omada’s amount is explicitly “undisclosed.”
Most recent rounds
14 shownRelated listings
Frequently asked
What stands out as an outlier in disclosed round size across these Denmark administrative-services startups?
Templafy’s $60M disclosed round on 2021-06-16 is the high end of the disclosed amounts in this slice, far above the broader set where many entries are at $6M, $3M, or below (e.g., Tame $6M on 2021-05-04; Likvido $3M on 2020-06-02; Question Base $120K on 2023-09-12).
Are there clear city clusters, or is Denmark evenly represented across locations?
Copenhagen dominates: 12 of 14 entries are listed in Copenhagen (for example, The Hub on 2026-06-26 at $1M and Zoios on 2024-05-13 at $2M). The remaining locations are isolated from that hub pattern, including Odense (QuadSAT, $6M on 2025-07-17), Aarhus (Question Base, $120K on 2023-09-12), and Værløse (SameSystem, $970K on 2022-08-10).
Which time window concentrates funding activity most strongly among the 14 most recent rows?
A dense block appears in May–June 2021: Forecast closed $19M on 2021-05-19; Worksome $13M on 2021-05-13; Tame $6M on 2021-05-04; then eloomi $55M on 2021-06-07 and Templafy $60M on 2021-06-16. This is a noticeably tighter clustering than the spread from 2020-06-02 (Likvido $3M) through 2026-06-26 (The Hub $1M).
How complete is the stage disclosure in this listing, and do undisclosed amounts affect interpretation?
Stage labels are frequently missing or generic: 7 of 14 rows show “Series Unknown” or a blank series (e.g., The Hub 2026-06-26 $1M is “Series Unknown”; Develop Diverse 2021-08-18 is “Venture - Series Unknown”). Separately, Omada on 2025-05-05 is “undisclosed” on amount, so it cannot be used in size comparisons like the $60M maximum.
Which entries are within the most recent 90 days of the latest row date shown?
The latest row is 2026-06-26 (The Hub, $1M), and within the prior ~90 days there are no other rows dated in that window in the data shown. The next most recent funding date is 2025-07-17 (QuadSAT, $6M), indicating a long gap between the newest entry and the prior record.
Is stage mix meaningfully represented by specific named stages, or do labels skew toward unknown/blank?
Named stages are present but are not the majority: visible examples include Seed (Zoios, $2M on 2024-05-13), Pre-Seed (Question Base, $120K on 2023-09-12), Series A (QuadSAT, $6M on 2025-07-17), and Post-IPO Equity (SameSystem, $970K on 2022-08-10). Even with those, missing or “Series Unknown”/blank entries still account for 7 of 14 rows, shaping the overall interpretability of stage trends.
Know which startups just got funded. Every week.
Fresh funding rounds, new companies, and the sectors moving fastest — in your inbox every Monday morning.
Free. Sent every Monday. Unsubscribe anytime.