FundedIQ

Funded Data and Analytics Startups in Denmark

Across the 12 most recent Denmark data-and-analytics rounds shown, one disclosed outlier stands out: Lenus eHealth raised $61M on 2021-06-08, which is well…

Across the 12 most recent Denmark data-and-analytics rounds shown, one disclosed outlier stands out: Lenus eHealth raised $61M on 2021-06-08, which is well above the next-largest disclosed rounds in this view (Light at $30M on 2025-09-28, Invert at $20M on 2024-07-10, and CluedIn at $15M on 2021-04-22). At the same time, the city footprint is concentrated: 9 of the 12 entries list Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, with only three outside it (Nørresundby; Viby; and Viby/Nordjylland-adjacent locales).

Timing clusters also appear. The newest round is Light’s Series A on 2025-09-28, while the oldest disclosed round in this set is Zymoscope’s Seed on 2021-02-24, spanning roughly four and a half years. Stage signals are mixed: only 4 entries explicitly show “Series A” (Light in 2025, Aegir Insights in 2024, CluedIn in 2021, and Invert is Seed), while 5 entries use “Series Unknown” or blank stage labels (including MapsPeople $1M on 2024-09-11 and Ocean.io $7M on 2022-01-14).

Most recent rounds

12 shown

Related listings

Frequently asked

What’s the biggest disclosed round in this Denmark data-and-analytics set, and how does it compare to the others?

Lenus eHealth’s $61M disclosed round on 2021-06-08 is the only disclosed amount above $50M in the 12-row view, and it sits far above the next-largest disclosed rounds: Light’s $30M (2025-09-28), Invert’s $20M (2024-07-10), and CluedIn’s $15M (2021-04-22).

Is Copenhagen over-represented, or are there meaningful geographic pockets elsewhere?

Copenhagen dominates the list: 9 of 12 rows are based in Copenhagen, Hovedstaden (e.g., Light, Ocean.io, CluedIn). The remaining 3 are dispersed across Nørresundby (MapsPeople, $1M on 2024-09-11) and Viby (Solitwork $100K on 2022-01-21, plus one more Viby/region entry in the table: Solitwork).

Which rounds fall into the most recent 90-day window relative to the latest date shown?

Using the newest row date of 2025-09-28 (Light), only one additional listed round lands within the subsequent 90 days in reverse chronological order: Acembee’s $1M Seed on 2025-08-25. The next prior entry is MapsPeople on 2024-09-11, which is outside that 90-day window.

How does the stage distribution look across these 12 rows, especially for entries with missing or unknown stage labels?

Explicit “Series A” appears in 4 rows (Light $30M on 2025-09-28; Aegir Insights $9M on 2024-02-13; CluedIn $15M on 2021-04-22; and one more Series A in the set). In contrast, 5 rows show “Series Unknown” (or blank/unstated stage, such as Lenus eHealth in 2021-06-08 and Risika in 2021-05-01), including Ocean.io ($7M on 2022-01-14) and Solitwork ($100K on 2022-01-21).

Are there low-end or high-end outliers by disclosed amount that stand apart from the rest?

Yes on both ends: the low end clusters around $1M (Acembee $1M on 2025-08-25; MapsPeople $1M on 2024-09-11; Nordetect $1M on 2021-03-15; Zymoscope $1M on 2021-02-24), while the high end is dominated by Lenus eHealth’s $61M (2021-06-08). The next step down from the top is Light at $30M (2025-09-28), making Lenus eHealth the clear magnitude outlier versus the rest of the disclosed amounts shown.

Free · Every Monday

Know which startups just got funded. Every week.

Fresh funding rounds, new companies, and the sectors moving fastest — in your inbox every Monday morning.

Free. Sent every Monday. Unsubscribe anytime.