Funded Startups in Newyork
Across the 9 most recent disclosed rounds, the largest disclosed amount is Markup AI’s $28M Series A on 2025-09-19, which is well above the rest of the dis…
Across the 9 most recent disclosed rounds, the largest disclosed amount is Markup AI’s $28M Series A on 2025-09-19, which is well above the rest of the disclosed figures (the next-highest disclosed entries are $11M on 2025-11-23 and $10M on 2025-09-13). The table also shows a tight geographic and timing concentration: all 9 entries list Newyork, United Kingdom or Newyork, Argyll and Bute, United Kingdom, and 4 of the 9 rounds fall between 2025-09-13 and 2025-10-03. Stages are weighted toward early rounds, with 4 Seed rounds carrying disclosed amounts ($11M on 2025-11-23, $10M on 2025-09-13, $6M on 2025-08-06, $9M on 2024-06-10). Two entries use undisclosed amounts (IndagoAI on 2025-10-03 and Nabr on 2022-07-28), and one entry leaves stage blank (Synch on 2024-03-18). The date range spans 2022-07-28 (Nabr, debt financing) through 2025-11-23 (Runlayer, Seed).
Most recent rounds
9 shownRelated listings
Frequently asked
Which disclosed round is the outlier, and how does it stack up against the other disclosed amounts?
Markup AI’s $28M Series A (2025-09-19) is the outlier on the disclosed side; the next-largest disclosed rounds are $11M (Runlayer, 2025-11-23) and $10M (Sphinx, 2025-09-13), with most other disclosed amounts clustered below that.
How concentrated are these deals in time based on the round dates shown?
There’s a clear late-2025 cluster: 4 of the 9 rows close between 2025-09-13 and 2025-10-03 (Sphinx 2025-09-13, Markup AI 2025-09-19, IndagoAI 2025-10-03, Runlayer 2025-11-23 is just outside that window but still in the same late-2025 period). The earliest row in view is Nabr on 2022-07-28, so the list spans nearly three years.
Does the list over-represent any city naming pattern, or are the locations consistently aligned?
All 9 entries reference Newyork, but they split between Newyork, United Kingdom (Runlayer, IndagoAI, Markup AI, Sphinx) and Newyork, Argyll and Bute, United Kingdom (Lava, Stitch Employment Services, Synch, Village of Endicott, Nabr). That keeps the geography consistent in naming while distinguishing the administrative label.
What stage mix dominates among the rounds listed, and are there any notable exceptions?
Seed is the main stage among the named stages: Runlayer (Seed, $11M), Sphinx (Seed, $10M), Lava (Seed, $6M), and Stitch Employment Services (Seed, $9M). Markup AI is the only Series A with a disclosed $28M (2025-09-19), while Synch (2024-03-18) has a blank stage label and IndagoAI (2025-10-03) has an undisclosed amount.
Are there sectors that show up repeatedly, or is the mix mostly one-offs?
Artificial Intelligence appears in 4 entries (Runlayer, IndagoAI, Markup AI, Sphinx), making it the only sector category repeated at this frequency. Other categories are more fragmented across Information Technology (Lava), Administrative Services (Stitch Employment Services), Financial Services (Synch), Other (Village of Endicott), Design (Nabr), and Cyber Security appears only alongside Runlayer.
Which entries have undisclosed amounts, and do they affect the interpretation of outliers?
IndagoAI (2025-10-03) and Nabr (2022-07-28) are the two undisclosed-amount rows, so they don’t contribute to the disclosed max comparison. Even with those excluded from the disclosed ladder, Markup AI’s $28M (2025-09-19) remains the clear top disclosed amount versus $11M (Runlayer) and $10M (Sphinx).
Know which startups just got funded. Every week.
Fresh funding rounds, new companies, and the sectors moving fastest — in your inbox every Monday morning.
Free. Sent every Monday. Unsubscribe anytime.